[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 22, Issue 1 (Spring 2020 2020) ::
علوم زراعی 2020, 22(1): 50-65 Back to browse issues page
Effect of transplanting and seed hydropriming on grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) as second crop in temperate region of Kermanshah, Iran
Farhad Sadeghi , Ali Mahrokh
Field and Horticultural Crops Sciences Research Departments, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract:   (2476 Views)
To save water, get suitable establishment, shorten growth duration and increase grain yield of maize, this experiment was conducted as split plot factorial arrangement in randomized complete block design with three replications at Mahidshat research station (Kermanshah, Iran) in 2017 and 2018 growing season. Two planting dates (10th  and 20th  of July) were assigned to main plots, and a combination of planting methods including; direct seeding, hydroprimed seed and transplanting with two  maize hybrids (KSC 704 and KSC 260) as factorial arrangement were randomized in sub plots. Resultsof combined analysis of variance showed that the effect of planting methods (direct seeding, hydroperimed seed and transplanting) was significant (P < 0.01) on plant height and ear, number of days to silk emergence and tasseling, grain moisture content and cob percentage and (P < 0.05) on number of grain per row. Grain yield in the first planting date (July 10) was 17% higher than the second planting date. Gain yield in transplanting (10466 kg.ha-1) and hydroprimed seed (10899 kg.ha-1) methods was higher than direct seeding (10300 kg.ha-1) by 2 and 6%, respectively. The highest grain yield of  KSC 704 (12203.3 kg.ha-1) and KSC260  (10276.4 kg.ha-1) obtained in the first planting date.Grain yield in the first planting date in hydroprimed seed of KSC 704 and KSC 260 was 11789 kg.ha-1 and 10153 kg.ha-1, respectively. Transplanting method caused early maturity of maize hybrids by 12 days. In general, under water shortage condition KSC 260 hybrid and transplanting would be more suitable.
Keywords: Direct seeding, Grain moisture contant, Maize, Physiological maturity and Transplanting.
Full-Text [PDF 650 kb]   (795 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Scientific & Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/04/6 | Accepted: 2020/05/19 | Published: 2020/05/19
References
1. Abdolrahmani, A., K. Ghasemi-Golezani, M. Valizadeh, V. Feizi-Asl and A. R. Tavakoli. 2011. Effect of seed priming on growth trend and grain yeild of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cv. Abidar under rainfed conditions. Seed Plant Prod J. 27-2 (1): 111-129. (In Persian with English abstract).
2. Abbasdokht, H., A. Gholami and H. Asghari. 2014. Halopriming and hydropriming treatments to overcome salt and drought stress at germination stage of corn (Zea mays L.). J. DESERT Res.19 (1): 27 -34. (In Persian with English abstract).
3. Abdul-Baki, A. A. and J. D. Anderson. 1970. Viability and leaching of sugars from germinating barley. Crop Sci. 10: 31-34. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183X001000010012x]
4. Agrawal, R. 2003. Seed Technology. Pub. Co. PVT. LTD. New Delhi. India.
5. Anonymous. 1398. Statistics and information of Kermanshah Agricultural Jihad Organization
6. Ashraf, M. and M. R. Foolad. 2005. Pre-sowing seed treatment, a shotgun approach to improve germination growth and crop yield under saline and non saline conditions. Adv. Agron. J. 88: 223-271. [DOI:10.1016/S0065-2113(05)88006-X]
7. Badran, M. S. S. 2001. Effect of transplanting and seedling age on grain yield and its components of some maize cultivars. Alexandria J. Agric. Res. 46 (2): 47-56.
8. Choukan, R. 2012. Situation of production of corn in Iran and worldwide. Key articles of the proceedings of the 12th Iranian Crop Sciences Congress. September 4-6, 2012. Islamic Azad University of Karaj. Iran. (In Persian with English abstract).
9. Choukan., R. and H. Hasanzadeh Moghadam. 2016. Response of different agronomic groups of maize to planting date in Mashhad region. Agric. Ecol. J. 2 (1): 158-167. (In Persian with English abstract).
10. Dale, A. E. and S. H. Drennan. 1997. Transplanted maize (Zea mays L.) for grain production in southern England. II. Effects of planting date, transplant age at planting and cultivar on growth, development and arvest index. J. Agric. Sci., Cambridge. 128 (1): 37- 44. [DOI:10.1017/S0021859696003887]
11. Di Benedetto, A. and J. Rattin. 2008. Transplant in sweet maize: a tool for improving productivity. Am. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2(2): 96-108.
12. Di Benedetto, A., C. Galmarini and J. Tognetti. 2013. Changes in leaf size and in the rate of leaf production contribute to cytokinin-mediated growth promotion in Epipremnum aureum L. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 88(2): 179-186. [DOI:10.1080/14620316.2013.11512954]
13. Duman, I. 2006. Effect of seed priming with PEG and K3PO4 on germination and seedling growth in lettuce. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 9(5): 923-928. [DOI:10.3923/pjbs.2006.923.928]
14. Fanadzo, M., S. Chiduza and P. N. Mnkeni. 2010. Comparative response of direct seeded and transplanted maize to nitrogen fertilization at Zanyokwe Irrigation Scheme, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 4(8): 689-694.
15. FAOSTAT, FAO. 2008. Statistics Division. http://faostat.fao.org/site.
16. Farooq, M., S. M. A. Basra, R. Tabassum and N. Ahmad. 2006. Evaluation of seed vigor enhancement techniques on physiological and biochemical techniques on physiological basis in coars rice. SEED Sci. Technol. J. 34: 741-750. [DOI:10.15258/sst.2006.34.3.18]
17. ISTA. 2008. Handbook for seedling evaluation (3rd. Ed.). International Seed Testing Assosiation (ISTA), Zurich, Switzerland.
18. Ghias-Abadi M., M. Khajeh-Hosseini and A. A. Mohammad-Abadi. 2014. Effects of transplanting date on growth and yield of forage maize (Zea mays L.) in Mashhad. Iran. J. Field Crops Sci, 12(1): 137-145. (In Persian with English abstract).
19. Maguire, J. D. 1962. Speed of germination in selection and evaluation for seedling vigor. Crop Sci. 2: 176-177. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1962.0011183X000200020033x]
20. Mohammadi, G. R. and F. Amiri. 2010. The effect of priming on seed performance of canola (Brasica napus L.) under drought stress. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 9 (2): 202-207.
21. Rashid, A. D., P. A. Harri, R. A. Hollington and M. Rafiq. 2006. Improving the yield of mungbean (Vigna radiata) in the North West Frontier Province of Pakistan using onfarm seed priming. Am. J. Exp. Agric. 40(2): 233-244. [DOI:10.1017/S0014479703001546]
22. Sanchez Andonova, P., J. Rattin and A. Di Benedetto. 2014. Yield increase as influence by transplanting of sweet corn (Zea mays L. Saccharata). Am. J. Exp. Agric. 4(11): 1314-1329. [DOI:10.9734/AJEA/2014/11077]
23. Sadeghian, S. Y. and N. Yavari. 2004. Effect of water-deficit stress on germmation and eary seedling growth in sugar beet. J. Agron.Crop Sci. 190: 138-144. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00087.x]
24. Sadeghi, F. 2015. Corn Prodution and Breeding. Pardisan Publications. 247 PP. (In Persian).
25. Sadeghi, F., R. Bagheri and Gh. Tajri. 2018. Effect of sowing date on late and medium maturity corn hybrids in Kermanshah. Res. Findings Improv. Crop Prod. J. 3(1): 66-82. (In Persian with English abstract).
26. Sadeghi, F., M. Norouzi, A. Lotfi and R. Jalilian. 2018. Effects of seed hydropriming and planting method on yield and yield components of corn under deficit irrigation conditions. Seed Plant Prod. J. 34(1): 53-71.
27. (In Persian with English abstract).
28. Zeinali, H. 1997. Study of growth indices and their relationship with yield in grain maize under different plant densities and planting dates. MSc Thesis. College of Agriculture, University of Tehran. 110 PP. (In Persian with English abstract).
29. Vantine, M. and S. Verlinden. 2003. Growing Organic Vegetable Transplants. West Verginia University. USA.
30. Wicklow, D. T. 1991. Epidemiology of Aspergillus flavus in Corn. In: Aflatoxin in Corn: New Perspectives (Ed.) Shotwell, O. L. and Hurburg, C. R. Jr. pp. 315-328. Research Bulletin 599. Ames, Iowa: Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station. USA.
31. (In Persian with English abstract). ##Zeinali, H. 1997. Study of growth indices and their relationship with yield in grain maize under different plant densities and planting dates. MSc Thesis. College of Agriculture, University of Tehran. 110 PP. (In Persian with English abstract). ##Vantine, M. and S. Verlinden. 2003. Growing Organic Vegetable Transplants. West Verginia University. USA.##Wicklow, D. T. 1991. Epidemiology of Aspergillus flavus in Corn. In: Aflatoxin in Corn: New Perspectives (Ed.) Shotwell, O. L. and Hurburg, C. R. Jr. pp. 315–328. Research Bulletin 599. Ames, Iowa: Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station. USA.##
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sadeghi F, Mahrokh A. Effect of transplanting and seed hydropriming on grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) as second crop in temperate region of Kermanshah, Iran. علوم زراعی 2020; 22 (1) :50-65
URL: http://agrobreedjournal.ir/article-1-981-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 22, Issue 1 (Spring 2020 2020) Back to browse issues page
نشریه علوم زراعی ایران Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645