[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 22, Issue 4 (2-2021) ::
علوم زراعی 2021, 22(4): 365-375 Back to browse issues page
Assessment of combining ability and comparison of selected selfed and open pollinated generations clones of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) ecotypes
Vida Ghotbi , Ali Moghaddam
Assistant Prof., Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
Abstract:   (1486 Views)
This study was conducted to quantitatively evaluate selfed (S1, S2 and S3) and open pollinated (OP1, OP2 and OP3) generations of alfalfa in terms of inbreeding depression and general combining ability of S2 families of alfalfa ecotypes. Selfing of selected plants to produce three generations of S1, S2 and S3 generations were performed under the field conditions and the clones of each selfed- generations were used for producing of open pollinated- generations.  For comparison of dry forage yield and plant height of selfed (S1, S2, S3) and open pollinated (OP1, OP2, OP3) generations randomized complete block design with three replications was employed in 2015 and 2016 growing seasons at Plant and Seed Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran.. The results revealed significant differences among ecotypes, generations and growing seasons and their two- way and three-way interactions for dry forage yield. Alfalfa ecotypes reacted differently to selfing, and the highest rate of vigor depression was observed in the S1 generation tropical ecotypes. However, vigor recovery observed in all ecotypes with continuing selfing and vigor remarkably increased in S3 generation. Vigour recovery was observed more in OP2 than OP3. The highest general combining ability for dry forage yield observed for Yazdi and Nikshahri ecotypes which are tropical ecotypes. Therefore, crossing of these ecotypes with ecotypes originated from different climatic conditions could be more effective in improvement of forage yield of synthetic and hybrid (semi or free hybrid) varieties in alfalfa. 
Keywords: Alfalfa, Forage yield, Inbreeding depression, Selfing and Vigour.
Full-Text [PDF 633 kb]   (730 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Scientific & Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/04/16 | Accepted: 2020/10/4 | Published: 2021/02/28
References
1. Al Lawati, A.H., C.A. Pierce, L.W. Murray and I.M. Ray. 2010. Combining ability and heterosis for forage yield among elite alfalfa core collection accessions with different fall dormancy responses. Crop Sci. 50: 150-158. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2008.09.0549]
2. Bhandari, H.S., C.A. Pierce, L.W. Murray and I.M. Ray. 2007. Combining abilities and heterosis for forage yield among high yielding accessions of the alfalfa core collection. Crop Sci. 47: 665-673. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0398]
3. Brummer, E.C. 1999. Capturing heterosis in forage crop cultivar development. Crop Sci. 39: 943-954. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900040001x]
4. Davis, R. L. 1955. An evaluation of S1 and polycross progeny testing. Agron. J. 47: 572-575. [DOI:10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700120006x]
5. Davis, R.L. and C.A. Panton. 1962. Combining ability in alfalfa. Crop Sci. 2: 35-37. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1962.0011183X000200010011x]
6. Demarly, Y. 1963. Genetiques des tetraploids at amelioration des plantes. These Fac. Sci. Ann. Ammelior Plantes. 13: 307-400.
7. Downey, R.K. 1962. Progeny testing and the formation of synthetic varieties of alfalfa. Diss. Abs. 22: order No. 62-162: 2529-30. In: Plant Breeding Abs. 417-1963.
8. Hill, R.R., Jr. J.S. Shenk and R.F. Barnes. 1988. Breeding for yield and quality. P. 809-825. In: Hanson, A.A, D.K. Barnes and R.R. Hill Jr. (Eds.). Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement. Agronomy Monographs. 29. ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI. USA. [DOI:10.2134/agronmonogr29.c26]
9. McAllister, D. R. 1951. The combining ability of selected alfalfa clones as related to the self fertility of the clones, their Fl and F2 progenies. Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 25: 283-284.
10. Michaud, R., W.F. Lehman and M.D. Rumbaugh. 1988. World distribution and historical development. 25-91. In: Hanson, A.A, D.K. Barnes and R.R. Hill Jr. (Eds.). Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement. Agronomy Monographs. 29. ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI. USA. [DOI:10.2134/agronmonogr29.c2]
11. Milić, D., D. Karagić, S. Vasiljevic, A. Mikić, B. Miloševic and S. Katić. 2014. Breeding and improvement of quality traits in alfalfa (Medicago sativa ssp. sativa L.). Genetika. 46: (1) 11-18. [DOI:10.2298/GENSR1401011M]
12. Milić, D., S. Katić, A. Mikić and D. Karagić. 2010. Heterotic response from a diallel analysis between alfalfa cultivars of different geographic origin. In: Cristian, H. (Ed.). Sustainable use of Genetic Diversity in Forage and Turf Breeding. 551-556. Springer. New York. USA. [DOI:10.1007/978-90-481-8706-5_82]
13. Monirifar, H. 2010. Half-sib progeny test for selection of best parents for development of a synthetic variety of alfalfa. Iran. J. Crop Sci. 12 (1): 66- 75. (In Persian with English abstract).
14. Panella, A. and F. Lorenzetti, 1966. Selfing and selection in alfalfa breeding programs. Euphytica, 15: 248-257. [DOI:10.1007/BF00022330]
15. Riday, H. and E.C. Brummer. 2002. Heterosis of agronomic traits in alfalfa. Crop Sci. 42: 1081-1087. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.1081]
16. Rotil, P. 1976. Performance of diallel crosses and second generation synthetics of alfalfa derived from partly inbred parents. П. Earliness and mortality. Crop Sci. 17: 245-248 [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183X001700020004x]
17. Rotili, P., G. Gnocchi, C. Scotti and L. Zannone. 2001. Some Aspects of Breeding Methodology in Alfalfa. Institute Sperimentale Perle Colture Foraggere-V.le Piacenza, 29-26900, Lodi, Italy.
18. Scotti, C. and E.C. Brummer. 2010. Creation of Heterotic Groups and Hybrid Varieties. In: Huyghe, C. (Ed.). Sustainable use of Genetic Diversity in Forage and Turf Breeding. 509- 518. [DOI:10.1007/978-90-481-8706-5_75]
19. Scotti, C., F. Pupilli, S. Salvi and S. Ariconi, 2000. Variation in vigor and in RFLP-estimated heterozygosity by selfing tetraploid alfalfa: new perspective for the use of selfing in alfalfa breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 120-125. [DOI:10.1007/s001220051459]
20. Sriwatanapongse, S. and C.P. Wilsie. 1968. Intra- and inter variety crosses of Medicago sativa L. and Medicago falcata L. Crop Sci. 8: 465- 466. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183X000800040021x]
21. Tysdal, H.M., T.A. Kiesselbach and H.L. Westover. 1942. Alfalfa Breeding. Research Bulletin: Bulletin of the Agricultural Experiment Station of Nebraska. No. 124. Nebraska, USA.
22. Veronesi, F., C. Huyghe and I. Delgado. 2006. Lucerne Breeding in Europe: Results and Research Strategies for Future Developments. In: Lloveras, J., A. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, O. Vazquez-Yanez, J. Pineiro, O. Santamaria, L. Olea and M.J. Poblaciones (Eds.) Sustainable Grassland Productivity. Proceedings on the 21st General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation. 3-6 April 2006, Badajoz, Spain.
23. Wilcox, J.R. 1962. Combining ability of nine alfalfa clones and reciprocal differences among their hybrids. Diss. Abs. 22: order No. 61-6191, 2555. In: Plant Breeding Abs. 418- 1963.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghotbi V, Moghaddam A. Assessment of combining ability and comparison of selected selfed and open pollinated generations clones of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) ecotypes. علوم زراعی 2021; 22 (4) :365-375
URL: http://agrobreedjournal.ir/article-1-1098-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 22, Issue 4 (2-2021) Back to browse issues page
نشریه علوم زراعی ایران Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645